Sunday, October 26, 2014

Horse Hill Investors beware

Horse Hill Investors beware
I think most people will know that I am not a fan of Horse Hill and the way that it has been discussed by David Lenigas. I haven’t been for months and wrote a piece back in August that I never actually put up on the site. I don’t like writing negative pieces on companies, but do feel that Horse Hill is perhaps one of the biggest injustices on AIM this year.
Lets start with Geology. Despite a few people not believing me, I did study both the Portland and Kimmeridge formations with an onsite geological study maybe 20 years ago. I have held kimmeridge clay that contains oil in my hands.
Now lets have a quick visual practical. If we take a sponge, put it in a bucket of water, then place the sponge on a piece of wood at an angle.
The water will quickly flow out of the sponge down the wood. After a little while the sponge will stop flowing water  and will just sit on the wood. If we poke the sponge it will be wet as it still contains water, even though all the free flowing water has disappeared.
The same applies to the Horse Hill potential oil layers, if we think of oil instead of water and the oil bearing rock layers as being sponges. Most of the oil a long time ago migrated out of the zones, however the zones still contain lots of oil. The problem is that the oil that’s left is stuck in the zone(sponge) and is not readily free flowing. If we poke the sponge with our fingers, it does get wet and in the same way if you drill into the oil soaked zones you will get oil shows, a very small portion of which will be moveable.
This is very well known. It’s always possible that the zones contain very large pockets that just happened to have a store of accessible oil or gas, but trying to find such pockets is still very very difficult particularly without newer 3D methods. 2D is notoriously bad at finding such targets (see FOGL and Scotia).
I do think that investors need to understand why UKOG and the associated rabble of companies attached to it have partaken in Horse Hill. In my opinion finding oil is not one of the primary reasons. Inflating a share price with wild talk about massive oil finds is a major reason, the ability to raise money is a reason, exposure is a reason and the longer term goals of the drill are a reason. Finding oil or gas would again in my opinion be a nice to have if we are lucky enough.
Many will remember David coming onto Twitter, ramping his poor little heart out, only to hit investors with a share placing, once the SP had gone up.
Many will also have just experienced the useful “leak” that talked in detail about a commercial oil discovery, which gathered in investors, spiked the share price and might, just might have enabled a few people to sell out at the top of the spike because they  knew the word “commercial was not actually in the release”.
Longer term drill reasons:  This was mentioned above, its important for investors to understand what I think these are. As many protestors at Horse Hill have known and also as the planning permission clearly hints at, Horse Hill is an exploratory drill aimed at assessed oil and gas porosity with a view to fracking. Obviously the Horse Hill consortium will flatly deny this, as will many gullible Private investors, but the geological reasons stand out a country mile. With lateral drilling alone Horse Hill might be commercially economical. With simple water pumping it might be or it might need the full fracking works. None of the above though will be allowed so close to such populated areas next to one of Europe’s busiest airports.
 
Target Reservoir
Oil
OOIP
Upside Potential (MMSTB)
OOIP
Mean (MMSTB)
Prospective Resources
Mean (MMSTB )
Upper Portland Sandstone
116
57
17
Lower Portland Sandstone
284
147
44
Corallian Sandstone
67
33
10
Greater Oolite Limestone
204
104
16
Total Oil
671
341
87
Target Reservoir
Gas
OGIP
Upside Potential (Bcf)
OGIP
Mean (Bcf)
Prospective Resources
Mean (Bcf)
Triassic Sandstone
456
234
164
(Taken from UKOG RNS)
So despite the above table taken from UKOG own data, this drilled showed 3.1 for the upper Portland, Water wet nothingness for the lower Portland target,  0 for Corallian and 0 for the greater Oolite, giving a total mean oil of 3.1, against even the lower target of 87 (lets not mention the higher 671 target, which was scary fantasy).
If we assume even a very generous 10% recovery that gives total reserves of just 300k, if we look at other similar plays then 2-3% is probably more likely giving just 100,000 barrels worth. Compared to the similar drills and nodding donkeys we would be looking at maybe 10-15 BOPD. Which by the way,  isn’t even coming to the surface at the moment  and almost certainly wouldn’t be economical with unconventional extraction.
A few final points.
UKOG and the Horse hill consortium are not the only ones to partake in exploration for the sake of doing something rather than actually exploring with a realistic aim of finding and extracting a resource. Its very common in gold exploration business for this to happen.
Horse hill only has a few days left on its exploration license so the management will be well aware of what the Gas plays contain even now. Remember that no logs will be ran on non-conventional targets.
And finally a prediction.
This will be spun out massively, rather pathetic rumours of a missed target to the south (which will keep things going a bit, despite never getting planning permission for a new drill, even if they did it would take a year or two in the UK). Any offshoot drilling should be forgotten about as there simply isn’t time on the license to do this.
New targets will be “discovered” with major potential…much like these existing targets with possible upside potential of 600m barrels of oil(in reality being a meagre 3m, which is never going to economical). New drills in exciting new areas will be discussed.
But most of all in 2 years time Horsehill will be seen as the cynical attempt it was to fool investors into putting money into an impossible pipe dream.
If you have lost or will lose money then I hope you learn from it, if you made money then your very lucky, if you made money selling whilst telling everyone how great it was then…
BTW I haven’t actually read, listened to any blogs etc on Horsehill, nor really read the forums, having obtained my info from RNS’s, tweets  el al  so sorry if this steps on anyone’s toes.

6 comments:

  1. Your comments carry no weight. You are a first class moron.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mmmm whose the moronic one here? The accuser or the eloquent factual well reasoned / argued blogger - mmmmm toughy lol

      Delete
  2. Had a lot of peeps claiming u am a shorter, that I am being paid to drag it down or even like you that I am a moron
    Simply though this is just my opinion, take it or leave it. I've not asked anybody to read it, I've not posted it on any forums etc and only included the link in a single tweet.
    Funny that although investors in HH are very accusatory nobody had actually disagreed and shown evidence that I am in anyway wrong !

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice article must have taken you some time to do...so whats the plan your upto ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Took me about 45 mins, most of the info was taken from a blog I wrote previously, some of it was taken from other correspondence, this is a tweet I wrote back in August "will be interesting it's not down to oil, it's how it will flow without fracking and lowish pressure"
      Stand by it 100%, I always said it would hit oil shows, but at the moment there is no commercial pathway to get it to surface.
      Re my plan. I have none, I haven't ever held shares in any company with a stake in HH, I haven't ever shorted a share, I don't believe that shorting AIM stocks should be allowed.
      My only plan is that I think HH is a perfect example of whats wrong with over hyped oil plays, with rumours and with David and his "management" style.

      Delete
  4. Investors should have asked who really thought the well would come in.

    original owner Magellan: no they farmed out to ensure their outlay was nil.

    operator Angus Energy: no they farmed out to ensure their outlay was nil.

    David Lenigas: no taken on for the liquidity/promote. Anyone who believed it would come good would've waited until results (and a higher share price that comes with it) to raise funds rather than doing the raising during drilling.

    Investors in placings of HH stocks: no in the main as these will have gone to flippers and punters hoping playing the greater fool game, that they'd be able to sell their discounted placing shares on higher price as momentum builds.

    Finally mug punters: last and least, those who believed the well would flow. This would be those who didn't properly research the history of the basin etc but just read the promoters spin (that Esso drilled the wrong side of the fault, it could be a mini Wytch farm, that there was room for conventional drilling in the Weald as everyone else was focused on non-conventional shale allowing a gap in the market etc).

    The 2 non-Lenigas companies who also took part, Alba Mineral Resources and Regency Mines, are somewhere between the Lenigas category and the mug punter category as they didn't raise much funds during drilling and their various directors statements suggest they may have fallen for the hype.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.