Horse Hill Investors beware
I think most people will know that I am not a fan of Horse
Hill and the way that it has been discussed by David Lenigas. I haven’t been
for months and wrote a piece back in August that I never actually put up on the
site. I don’t like writing negative pieces on companies, but do feel that Horse
Hill is perhaps one of the biggest injustices on AIM this year.
Lets start with Geology. Despite a few people not believing
me, I did study both the Portland and Kimmeridge formations with an onsite
geological study maybe 20 years ago. I have held kimmeridge clay that contains
oil in my hands.
Now lets have a quick visual practical. If we take a sponge,
put it in a bucket of water, then place the sponge on a piece of wood at an
angle.
The water will quickly flow out of the sponge down the wood.
After a little while the sponge will stop flowing water and will just sit on the wood. If we poke the
sponge it will be wet as it still contains water, even though all the free
flowing water has disappeared.
The same applies to the Horse Hill potential oil layers, if
we think of oil instead of water and the oil bearing rock layers as being
sponges. Most of the oil a long time ago migrated out of the zones, however the
zones still contain lots of oil. The problem is that the oil that’s left is
stuck in the zone(sponge) and is not readily free flowing. If we poke the
sponge with our fingers, it does get wet and in the same way if you drill into
the oil soaked zones you will get oil shows, a very small portion of which will
be moveable.
This is very well known. It’s always possible that the zones
contain very large pockets that just happened to have a store of accessible oil
or gas, but trying to find such pockets is still very very difficult
particularly without newer 3D methods. 2D is notoriously bad at finding such
targets (see FOGL and Scotia).
I do think that investors need to understand why UKOG and
the associated rabble of companies attached to it have partaken in Horse Hill.
In my opinion finding oil is not one of the primary reasons. Inflating a share
price with wild talk about massive oil finds is a major reason, the ability to
raise money is a reason, exposure is a reason and the longer term goals of the
drill are a reason. Finding oil or gas would again in my opinion be a nice to
have if we are lucky enough.
Many will remember David coming onto Twitter, ramping his
poor little heart out, only to hit investors with a share placing, once the SP
had gone up.
Many will also have just experienced the useful “leak” that
talked in detail about a commercial oil discovery, which gathered in investors,
spiked the share price and might, just might have enabled a few people to sell
out at the top of the spike because they
knew the word “commercial was not actually in the release”.
Longer term drill reasons:
This was mentioned above, its important for investors to understand what
I think these are. As many protestors at Horse Hill have known and also as the
planning permission clearly hints at, Horse Hill is an exploratory drill aimed
at assessed oil and gas porosity with a view to fracking. Obviously the Horse
Hill consortium will flatly deny this, as will many gullible Private investors,
but the geological reasons stand out a country mile. With lateral drilling
alone Horse Hill might be commercially economical. With simple water pumping it
might be or it might need the full fracking works. None of the above though
will be allowed so close to such populated areas next to one of Europe’s
busiest airports.
Target Reservoir
Oil
|
OOIP
Upside Potential (MMSTB)
|
OOIP
Mean (MMSTB)
|
Prospective Resources
Mean (MMSTB )
|
Upper Portland Sandstone
|
116
|
57
|
17
|
Lower Portland Sandstone
|
284
|
147
|
44
|
Corallian Sandstone
|
67
|
33
|
10
|
Greater Oolite Limestone
|
204
|
104
|
16
|
Total Oil
|
671
|
341
|
87
|
Target Reservoir
Gas
|
OGIP
Upside Potential (Bcf)
|
OGIP
Mean (Bcf)
|
Prospective Resources
Mean (Bcf)
|
Triassic Sandstone
|
456
|
234
|
164
|
(Taken from UKOG RNS)
So despite the above table taken from UKOG own data, this
drilled showed 3.1 for the upper Portland, Water wet nothingness for the lower
Portland target, 0 for Corallian and 0
for the greater Oolite, giving a total mean oil of 3.1, against even the lower
target of 87 (lets not mention the higher 671 target, which was scary fantasy).
If we assume even a very generous 10% recovery that gives
total reserves of just 300k, if we look at other similar plays then 2-3% is
probably more likely giving just 100,000 barrels worth. Compared to the similar
drills and nodding donkeys we would be looking at maybe 10-15 BOPD. Which by
the way, isn’t even coming to the
surface at the moment and almost
certainly wouldn’t be economical with unconventional extraction.
A few final points.
UKOG and the Horse hill consortium are not the only ones to
partake in exploration for the sake of doing something rather than actually
exploring with a realistic aim of finding and extracting a resource. Its very
common in gold exploration business for this to happen.
Horse hill only has a few days left on its exploration
license so the management will be well aware of what the Gas plays contain even
now. Remember that no logs will be ran on non-conventional targets.
And finally a prediction.
This will be spun out massively, rather pathetic rumours of
a missed target to the south (which will keep things going a bit, despite never
getting planning permission for a new drill, even if they did it would take a
year or two in the UK). Any offshoot drilling should be forgotten about as
there simply isn’t time on the license to do this.
New targets will be “discovered” with major potential…much
like these existing targets with possible upside potential of 600m barrels of
oil(in reality being a meagre 3m, which is never going to economical). New
drills in exciting new areas will be discussed.
But most of all in 2 years time Horsehill will be seen as
the cynical attempt it was to fool investors into putting money into an
impossible pipe dream.
If you have lost or will lose money then I hope you learn
from it, if you made money then your very lucky, if you made money selling
whilst telling everyone how great it was then…
BTW I haven’t actually read, listened to any blogs etc on
Horsehill, nor really read the forums, having obtained my info from RNS’s,
tweets el al so sorry if this steps on anyone’s toes.
Your comments carry no weight. You are a first class moron.
ReplyDeleteMmmm whose the moronic one here? The accuser or the eloquent factual well reasoned / argued blogger - mmmmm toughy lol
DeleteHad a lot of peeps claiming u am a shorter, that I am being paid to drag it down or even like you that I am a moron
ReplyDeleteSimply though this is just my opinion, take it or leave it. I've not asked anybody to read it, I've not posted it on any forums etc and only included the link in a single tweet.
Funny that although investors in HH are very accusatory nobody had actually disagreed and shown evidence that I am in anyway wrong !
Nice article must have taken you some time to do...so whats the plan your upto ?
ReplyDeleteTook me about 45 mins, most of the info was taken from a blog I wrote previously, some of it was taken from other correspondence, this is a tweet I wrote back in August "will be interesting it's not down to oil, it's how it will flow without fracking and lowish pressure"
DeleteStand by it 100%, I always said it would hit oil shows, but at the moment there is no commercial pathway to get it to surface.
Re my plan. I have none, I haven't ever held shares in any company with a stake in HH, I haven't ever shorted a share, I don't believe that shorting AIM stocks should be allowed.
My only plan is that I think HH is a perfect example of whats wrong with over hyped oil plays, with rumours and with David and his "management" style.
Investors should have asked who really thought the well would come in.
ReplyDeleteoriginal owner Magellan: no they farmed out to ensure their outlay was nil.
operator Angus Energy: no they farmed out to ensure their outlay was nil.
David Lenigas: no taken on for the liquidity/promote. Anyone who believed it would come good would've waited until results (and a higher share price that comes with it) to raise funds rather than doing the raising during drilling.
Investors in placings of HH stocks: no in the main as these will have gone to flippers and punters hoping playing the greater fool game, that they'd be able to sell their discounted placing shares on higher price as momentum builds.
Finally mug punters: last and least, those who believed the well would flow. This would be those who didn't properly research the history of the basin etc but just read the promoters spin (that Esso drilled the wrong side of the fault, it could be a mini Wytch farm, that there was room for conventional drilling in the Weald as everyone else was focused on non-conventional shale allowing a gap in the market etc).
The 2 non-Lenigas companies who also took part, Alba Mineral Resources and Regency Mines, are somewhere between the Lenigas category and the mug punter category as they didn't raise much funds during drilling and their various directors statements suggest they may have fallen for the hype.