Many think that a certain decomposing dead body smell is
coming from the remains of Afren. This has largely come about through the stories
and leaks with a source from JP Morgan.
I fully admit it wasn’t until pretty recently that I first
started to invest in Afren, mainly as I saw a nice trading opportunity. I had
heard and knew the rumours about massive dilutions, the company on the ropes
needing massive cash injections. It’s fair to say I saw the risk, but also a
short term gain.
After my third trade I researched Afren a little more to see
what potential it had as a longer term recovery stock, which is where it became
more interesting….see the first blog here http://icebergshares.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/gkp-v-afren.html
As an investor and somebody who is generally very sceptical
about how the financial industry works. My mind started to churn in its slow
ponderous way as to what angle J P Morgan was playing….Everything seemed to be
coming from J P Morgan. Their meddling started awhile back but intensified with
a news article on the 28th of January.
“The company, which operates in Nigeria and Iraq, needs the
money to meet funding requirements that are higher than its market
capitalization, analyst Zafar Nazim wrote in a note to clients.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-28/afren-may-need-to-raise-450-million-for-funding-jpmorgan-says
This was further reinforced on the 27/02 when Julie Miecamp and Luca Casiraghi again released a Bloomberg
article painting Afren in the worst possible light.
“Ashmore Group Plc, JPMorgan Asset
Management and Pacific Investment Management Co. are among creditors offering
to provide Afren with the cash it needs to avoid a possible default as soon as
Friday, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the talks are
private.”
Afren themselves admitted in January that they suffered from
liquidity issues caused by the very low Oil price (at the time below $50) but
refused to really expand on how severe the problems were. They did request an
extra month to make a $50m bond payment so we know this was a real issue.
However the actual amount needed has remained a mystery.
We have confirmation then that JP Morgan are a Bond
Holder….Would the bond holders like to see Afren in as much trouble, to take
over as much of a valuable company as possible ? If the bond holders are
offered warrants at a % of a 5-10 day share price, would they like the price as
low as possible ?
Um….it’s worth thinking about.
So let’s dig a little deeper, Mr Zafar Nazim JP Morgan
business analyst. Has he made some good calls in the past or has he maybe
pushed a certain angle?….
In 2012 we had an interesting story, which (it will come as
no surprised to learn) concerned a large company which was struggling to
refinance its bonds, which were held by JP Morgan….
“In a footnote in its 2011 financial statements last week, DIFCI said it sold one of its discontinued businesses held-for-sale after the financial year ended to a 'related party.' It did not name the business…This sale could only be of SmartStream given the magnitude of impairment,' JP Morgan analyst Zafar Nazim said in the note, adding that other businesses held for-sale by DIFCI had minimal associated goodwill balances”
http://www.tradearabia.com/news/BANK_217072.html
It all seems very sensible until we get.
“No deal has been made yet. It is in the middle of the process," Mohammad Al Shaibani told Reuters on Friday on the sidelines of a business forum.
"I think that more than one entity is looking at it, among them are some of the Dubai government-related companies. They are showing a keen interest in this process," he said. JP Morgan had said in a research note earlier this month that, based on a footnote in its 2011 financial statement, DIFCI has likely sold SmartStream to Dubai or the ICD, resulting in a $68.8 million (Dh252.7 million) impairment provision”
So just over 2 weeks later we find out that Mr Nazim had
been telling porkies and was very wrong about the current state of the company.
I wonder whether JP Morgan gained from this in anyway?
So back to Afren, we have a series of JP Morgan related
stories spreading doom and gloom around Afren. Certainly one of the credited
people from JP Morgan has a less than perfect record about getting his facts
right. We have a conflict of interest where JP Morgan is a key decision maker
in the bond holders and yet it’s telling its clients to sell and itself will
benefit from a low SP.
More eagle eyed investors will also have noticed that JP Morgan has been the major player on both sides of the L2 order book for Afren, sometimes being on both sides at the same time, a practice which is generally frown upon due to its ability to force price movements.
Is all of this coincidence?
More eagle eyed investors will also have noticed that JP Morgan has been the major player on both sides of the L2 order book for Afren, sometimes being on both sides at the same time, a practice which is generally frown upon due to its ability to force price movements.
Is all of this coincidence?
We have an Oil price which is materially higher than it was
when Afren made its RNS statement. It’s
declined one takeover offer and had a deadline today, which has been and gone
without an RNS statement saying it had defaulted.
Now I am not saying
that everything is rosy, Afren certainly needs some money, does it need the
$450m (or changed to $350m a few weeks later) that JP Morgan claims ? probably
not in my opinion. Do I trust JP Morgan to be telling me the truth…probably
not.
Its always worth digging a bit with these things and never,
never trusting the investment banks. As soon as it suits them it will be BUY
BUY BUY 100p target. Pay attention to the oil price and consider whether you
might want to take a bit of a risk.
If you smell something around Afren consider it might not be
Afren’s decomposing corpse, but might be the layers of sh*t being sprayed by
certain bold holders. A quick thunderstorm of news might well wash it all away.
"Afren themselves admitted in January that they suffered from liquidity issues caused by the very low Oil price (at the time below $50) but refused to really expand on how severe the problems were. They did request an extra month to make a $50m bond payment so we know this was a real issue.
ReplyDeleteHowever the actual amount needed has remained a mystery."
Dont you read RNS??
"The Board has reviewed its business plan with the aim of minimising its funding requirements in the current oil price
environment to focus on the development of the Company’s core assets in Nigeria. Assuming the Company’s current debt
structure remains unchanged, there is an equity funding requirement which is likely to be significant and in excess of the
Company’s current market capitalisation. New funds will be required to meet interest and principal repayments, working capital
and a reduced capital expenditure programme. The Company will be having discussions with its existing stakeholders and new
third party investors regarding recapitalising the Company."